Manifest Destiny

Published by:

Americans and foreigners agree that the United States is a world leader and a special nation. Just one aspect is the American military supremacy. Another aspect is its image as a leader of ideals. And it is the latter, the position of moral leadership, that most deserves national pride.

The United States was born of the colonists’ thirst for liberty, at a time when power-hungry despotism was the norm. America has a compelling interest in protecting democracy and civil rights, which has continued to this day. Americans use these goals as a justification for our prominence on the global stage.

If the United States did not hold lofty ideals, then it would not be fair for it to consider itself special. The union is sacred only insofar as it preserves the sanctity of human freedom. If the United States were to become a nation that suppresses human rights, then Americans would still harbor national pride, but it would become an empty attachment. It would resemble the pride that a school has in its football team, a pride that is based on ego rather than on ethos. Patriotism that is healthy is neither offended by criticism nor blind to the faults of the nation. Citizens with an open-minded attitude are best positioned to help the country improve.

It is easy to forget that democracy is fragile. A powerful government tends to expand its power at the expense of individual rights. Many statesmen have warned, “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” With a single generation of complacent citizens, the government could transform itself in ways that the forefathers would have considered monstrous. In name, the country would still be the United States, but in spirit it would not continue their legacy.

The continued survival of the American experiment depends on success on two different battlefronts. The first is the military conflicts with all other countries. This is the external and obvious battlefront. The second battle is internal. It is the struggle to preserve the integrity of the nation. If the United States were to conquer in every war it entered, but at the same time begin to resemble the governments of its enemies, then the military victories would be hollow. This means that if the only way to protect national security is to trample on human rights, then the price is too high. There are just and unjust ways to win wars. The upright way requires respect for the rights of both citizens and enemy combatants. This is especially true when the world is in peril. Benjamin Franklin said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

The power of the United States is a responsibility that ought to be earned, not treated as a divine right or a manifest destiny. Good citizens should be introspective and scrutinize the acts of their own government. Good patriots should honor the country for the good that it does in the world.


Published by:

Dualism is a traditional belief that we are all made up of a physical body and a spiritual body. We believe that the spirit inhabits the body until death.

Teachers routinely use the analogy about a hand in a glove:

Explain that in this example the glove represents the physical body and the hand represents the spirit. When the spirit enters the body, the body can live, work, and act.

This analogy implies that the spirit is responsible for controlling the movements of the body. But nobody really has a good explanation for how the spirit interacts with the physical body. In order to affect physical muscles or even physical neurons, physical energy must be applied. And if physical energy is present, then it can be measured by scientific instruments just like any other physical events. But we usually think of the spirit as something that can’t be measured. In fact, any part of the spirit that can be observed physically should not be considered to be spiritual, by definition.

There is a different analogy that I like better, of a masterpiece painting. The painting is physically made up of oils and a canvas. But people looking at the painting can feel something deeper in it. The painting can have a spiritual presence. I think you could say that the painting wouldn’t be alive without that spirit. As another example, we recognize sacred places by the spiritual qualities attached to them.

Likewise, I think that it is our spirits that give our lives deeper meaning. Our physical bodies are just the machines, where pain is sensed and muscles are flexed. Our spirits inhabit the machinery, without interfering with it. Nothing from the spiritual realm ever enters the physical realm, nor does it need to. Even our power to make decisions is seated solely in our physical brains. This belief is called epiphenomenalism, an unpopular version of dualism. Continue reading

Personal Revelation

Published by:

Lots more people have started reading the Book of Mormon than have finished it. I suspect that the first stories in the Book of Mormon were specially chosen because they would be read thousands of times more often than the final stories. And which stories were given prominence? In the 4th chapter, Nephi was asked to slay the unconscious Laban in the streets. It’s interesting that only a few pages into the book a man was commanded to break one of the Ten Commandments.

There’s a similar conflict in the story of Abraham’s sacrifice. Kierkegaard wrote about the angst he imagined for Abraham in Fear and Trembling. Abraham was willing to obey, even though he was potentially disqualifying himself from heaven. Kierkegaard asked how Abraham could know that he was interpreting God’s words correctly, especially with the stakes so high. He had to have enough faith in his new vision to disobey God’s laws that had been established by great prophets in other generations. Continue reading